An all to familiar sight - a bank closure notice |
Bank closures, often by stealth, are
a fact of life for many communities across much of rural and urban Wales – back
on January 11th HSBC announced that branches in Ruabon, Chirk,
Amlwch and Menai Bridge will close in April. Back in June 2015 Natwest
announced its plans to close 11 branches in north Wales in September (St Asaph,
Denbigh, Corwen and Llangollen in Denbighshire, as will the branches in
Abersoch, Blaenau Ffestiniog and Tywyn in Gwynedd and those in Abergele and
Rhos-on-Sea in Conwy, Buckley in Flintshire and Rossett in Wrexham).
The BBC noted that more than 600 bank branches have closed across Britain
over the past year, with rural areas worst affected and that parts of Wales,
Scotland and south west England lost the most per population between April 2015
and April 2016. The figures obtained revealed that five of the top 10 areas
losing banks are in Wales: Powys, Denbighshire, Gwynedd, Conwy, and
Carmarthenshire. The data revealed by BBC Breakfast - came from the big
six High Street banks: Lloyds, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), HSBC, Santander,
Barclays and the Co-operative.
Now sadly this is nothing
new, at the end of October 2014 Lloyd’s announced that it would close 150 branches (7% of its
2,250 branches) and shed some 9,000 jobs (the bank has incidentally already
shed 43,000 jobs since the largely bank driven financial crash back in
2008). In October 2014, Vince Cable, the then Secretary of State for
Business, Innovation and Skills was apparently going to write to UK banks to
demanding that the banks commit to keeping ‘the last branch in town’ open.
Sadly was probably a little late as a growing number of communities in Wales,
which already have no bank (28 as of December 2015), and the forty-seven which
only have one bank, as noted by the Campaign for Community Banking Services.
The problem of closing
banks affects all parts of Wales, while it is more readily identifiable in
rural communities; but it also affects our urban areas as well –
inconveniencing both personal and business customers. Bank closures
proportionally hit older people harder as they may have problems with access to
regular public transport. Age Cymru also noted that having a local bank that
was convenient for older people was "vital" for ensuring they did not
become socially isolated and that older people were at increased risk of
financial abuse because of the branch closures.
More locally in
Newport there has been a stealth-like closure of local high street banks -Caerleon’s HSBC
branch in Backhall Street (closed on 2nd November 2012) – despite a campaign to
save the small town’s only bank from closure, which had gained the support of
hundreds of people who signed a petition against the closure. HSBC
had already closed the next nearest branch to Caerleon, on Caerleon Road, in St
Julian’s (which was closed June 2011) – so much of listening to their
customers.
While Lloyds in
2011/2012 was in the frame for a raft of closures, HSBC had already
systematically closed branches across much of Wales - Presteigne, (which closed
on Friday 9th March 2012) despite over 500 people signing a petition against
the closure), and Blaenafon,
in Torfaen (which closed on the 11th May 2012) despite over a 1,000 people
signed a petition against the closure of what was literally the
last bank in the town). The excuse was that both banks had seen a
significant decline in the numbers of customers using their services and the branches
were no longer commercially viable.
Campaigners against bank closures rightly claim that businesses in an area where a bank closes suffer and that residents (especially the elderly) who are reliant on public transport to bank in a nearby town are disadvantaged. Just for the record HSBC had closed six branches in Wales between September 2010 and December 2011, including Llandysul, Ceredigion, and Llanrhaeadr-ym-Mochnant in Powys.
The company has closed 17 "under-used" banks
in Wales (since 2009) in both urban and rural areas. HSBC, Barclays and
the rest have been quietly closing small rural banks in recent years, and
NatWest and Barclays have also reduced bank-opening hours. The British Bankers'
Association says more customers now go on-line and banks must examine
branch-running costs.
Despite the spin (about the growth in on-line banking
and it’s use – if you have no choice what else are people going to do) this is
about nothing more than cutting running costs, the banks have little (or no
concern) for their relatively unprofitable personal customers or the concerns
of their local business customers or our smaller communities. As has been noted
by the US Senate, some banks have other more pressing interests than those
of their domestic customers like helping to launder
money for drug dealers, dictators and terrorists, so much for
being a local bank.
Local banks are good for the high street and local communities, they
help to promote vitality and vibrancy and make it easier for local businesses
to operate. Local businesses to a degree benefit from the existence of
local high street branches by picking up passing trade from bank customers.
Once local bank branches close, the impact will be felt locally especially by
older residents and local business owners who have to trek further and further
to pay in their taking and the subsequent drop in passing trade – this
situation has been aggravated by the demise of many building societies. It is of course
important to remember that one result of the demise of the regional banks was
the rise of the big 4 banks which led to the growth of the reckless casino
banking and cheap credit that brought about the financial crash.
When
you factor in the ruthless Post Office closure programme that has been pushed
through by the then Labour Government, and the Con - Dem coalition government
prior to it’s privatisation of the Post Office which in turn was preceded by
the rapid floatation and rapid demise of most of our building societies you can
clearly see how we got here - sorting the mess out is not going to be easy. It is perhaps a pity that we don’t have some sort of risk free Post Office Savings bank – save for the fact that it was recklessly sold of by a previous Conservative government.